$100M Pension Scam Run by Ex-Con Hit With Lawsuits

Published by Think Advisor
August 24, 2018 at 11:13 AM
By Melanie Waddell

 

A series of lawsuits were filed nationwide Thursday in a bid to help swindled investors — mostly retirees — retrieve the money they invested in a $100 million sham pension scheme concocted by a former felon who’s on the run.

The law firm Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane initiated a coordinated wave of five lawsuits targeting the purported legitimate financial professionals who made the Future Income Payments LLC, or FIP, scheme work.

“We’re seeking recovery for these swindled investors from insurance agents, investment advisors and brokers in the Los Angeles area, the Houston area, Chicago, northern Florida and Philadelphia and New Jersey,” said Joseph Peiffer, attorney and managing shareholder at PWCK, on a Thursday media call. “Coast to coast, all the way around this country, because that’s where this stuff was sold.”

The investors were encouraged to buy into “structured cash flows” through FIP.

Attempts to reach FIP for comment were unsuccessful.

Investors paid — in most cases every cent they had — to buy a monthly income stream for a set term (usually five or 10 years) under a pension advance arrangement targeting individuals with fixed pensions (often retired police officers, teachers and veterans), PWCK explained.

FIP is a small Nevada company run by a California ex-felon, Scott Kohn, who Peiffer said on the call is “now nowhere to be found.”

As one of the complaint states, Kohn “pleaded guilty in 2006 to three federal felony offenses related to trafficking in counterfeit goods, and he was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison.”

As Peiffer explained, several states have ruled the FIP pension purchases to be illegal loans at up to 200% interest. “Because of mounting regulatory pressure and multiple cease-and-desist orders, FIP stopped collecting payments from pensioners or making payments to investors on or about April 2018,” he said.

As part of the scheme, most investors also were encouraged to purchase life insurance and indexed universal life insurance policies.

FIP “purchased” the future income from the pensioners on an upfront, lump-sum and heavily discounted basis. The insurance agents, brokers, financial planners and investment advisor firms that promoted the scheme to investors collected a healthy commission.

“The massive scale of this investment swindle could not have happened without an eager and complicit network of brokers, investment advisors, financial planners, insurance agents and other middlemen like wholesalers, distributors and life insurance companies,” Peiffer said.

FIP characterized the transactions with pensioners as “purchases,” but as one filing states, “numerous state and federal regulators have investigated and determined that these deals were, in fact, loans,” and were “unlawful transactions, as they were made by an unlicensed lender (FIP) at effective interest rates that violated state usury laws, without legally mandated disclosures.”

The law firm Gana Weinstein LLP stated on its website that it’s also investigating investor recovery options related to FIP, and that FIP has been subject to regulatory action in numerous states including at least Washington, California, Colorado, Iowa, Indiana, North Carolina, New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Virginia.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau also served FIP on Nov. 23, 2016, with a Civil Investigative Demand. “In response, FIP requested the order to be dismissed and also filed its own lawsuit challenging the bureau’s constitutionality and demanding that the firm’s name be kept confidential. Future Income Payments lost that bid,” Gana Weinstein stated.

One case among the suits filed Thursday involved Scott Kayser, a 55-year-old small business owner in Toms River, New Jersey, who believed he was investing with a financial advisor when in fact he was an insurance agent.

The agent, Daniel Sharpe, held “himself out as an expert in financial planning and retirement planning,” the complaint states. “Sharpe previously was registered as a broker and investment advisor but is currently only licensed to sell insurance products. As such, Sharpe’s advice to clients primarily involved the sales of insurance products.”

The agent wanted to put Kayser into an indexed universal life policy, so he told Kayser the only way to fund the policy was through FIP.

The agent convinced Scott to put $75,000 from his savings and IRA into FIP.

Another case involved Eldridge Parker of Tampa, Florida, who was retired when he started working with Derek Ifasi.

Ifasi recommended FIP and had Parker invest $225,000 into it. At the same time, he had Parker put $224,000 into an annuity, according to PWCK.

Parker is now unable to access his remaining retirement money. “Moreover, Ifasi told Parker to go back to work so he could afford to put his new paycheck into FIP,” according to PWCK.

“Parker was forced to sell his car to create an emergency fund. His current monthly expenses are $1,352, and he only takes in $1,100 per month from his new full-time job.” PWCK said. “He now works multiple additional shifts to try and cover his monthly expenses.”

What to Do if You Think You Were a Victim of Investment Fraud or Broker Misconduct

If you believe you were a victim of investment fraud or broker misconduct, it is imperative to take action. Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane has represented thousands of victims, and we remain committed to fighting on behalf of investors.

Contact Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane today by filling out a Contact Form on our website or by calling 585-310-5410 to schedule a FREE Case Evaluation.

About Peiffer Wolf  Carr & Kane, APLC

Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane is a nationwide litigation law firm that represents individuals and entities that have been the victims of negligence, fraud or the misconduct of powerful interests.  We are smart, experienced, and dedicated professionals who work tirelessly for our clients and take pride in the pursuit of justice on their behalf.  Too often the powerful interests in our society run over the rights of ordinary people. We do our best to restore that balance.

prwlegal201 (15 Posts)


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.