Elderly investors win $3.2 million Finra arbitration award against Axa Advisors

Published by Investment News

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

May 1, 2019 @ 2:29 pm

Upstate New York couple cites five unsuitable variable annuity, life insurance transactions

 

An elderly couple in upstate New York won a $3.2 million Finra arbitration award against Axa Advisors in a case involving unsuitable variable annuity and life insurance sales.

James and Sandra Fitzpatrick alleged that their then-Axa representative, Francesco Puccio, made five transactions beginning in 2011 and continuing until 2014 that produced large commissions for Mr. Puccio but were damaging to the Fitzpatricks’ assets and estate plan, according to an affidavit filed in New York Supreme Court.

They alleged that Mr. Puccio sold them the products to generate more income for himself so that he could pay his bills during a time of personal financial trouble.

A three-person, all-public Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel awarded the Fitzpatricks $2.2 million in compensatory damages, $889,868 in attorneys’ fees and $67,293 in costs. The arbitrators declined to award punitive damages.

The Fitzpatricks originally asked for $3 million in compensatory damages.

“We’re thrilled with the outcome,” said Joseph Peiffer, partner at Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane, who represented the Fitzpatricks. “It finally holds Axa accountable.”

Neither an Axa spokesman nor Joseph S. Simms, a partner at Reminger Co. LPA who represented the firm, were immediately available for comment.

Cambridge Investment Research Inc. also was named as a respondent in the Finra arbitration. The Fitzpatricks settled with Cambridge in January 2018, according to the arbitration award. Mr. Puccio’s BrokerCheck profile indicates the agreement was for $115,000.

The Fitzpatricks, who own the Fitzpatrick Poultry Farm in Whitesville, N.Y., worked with Mr. Puccio when he was a representative in Axa’s Rochester, N.Y., office. James Fitzpatrick is 90, and Sandra Fitzpatrick is 77.

The sale of unsuitable variable annuities and life insurance products is rampant in upstate New York, Mr. Peiffer asserted. He said he is pursuing more cases against Axa.

“This is a huge shot across the bow,” he said. “If you sell this crap that people don’t need and is too expensive, you have to pay them back for it. I don’t know how many whacks upside the head it will take for Axa to get its act straight, but we’ll keep swinging until they do.”

Axa has had trouble in the state previously. In 2014, the New York Department of Financial Services fined the firm $20 million for annuity sales violations.

In a separate, pending Finra arbitration case, Mr. Puccio is accused of stealing money from another Axa client, Shirley Kerwin, 81.

Mr. Puccio never should have been hired by Axa in 2011 because of financial difficulties he was going through, Mr. Peiffer said.

“Puccio sold [the Fitzpatricks] high-commission products because he could not pay his bills,” the affidavit states.

According to the document, Axa learned of Mr. Puccio’s ongoing tax liens in 2013 but did not put him on heightened supervision for another six months. Four months into the stepped-up supervision, the fifth unsuitable transaction occurred.

Mr. Puccio left Axa for Cambridge in 2014 and stayed there for one year, according to his BrokerCheck profile. He has been barred from the industry by Finra.

The Fitzpatricks followed him to Cambridge, where more abuses occurred, according to the affidavit. Axa did flag some of Mr. Puccio’s transactions involving the couple but didn’t inform them of its findings or tell them about his credit troubles.

FREE Consultation |  585-310-5140

Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane has helped thousands of investors who have suffered substantial losses. If you have Variable Annuities or Life Insurance Products in your investment portfolio, Contact Us by calling 585-310-5140 or by filling out an online Contact Form for a FREE Consultation.

Peiffer Wolf (1297 Posts)


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.