Former Dayton area broker ordered to pay $1.1M; faces criminal charges

Published by Springfield News-Sun

By Thomas Gnau

Updated Feb 25, 2019

DAYTON — A U.S. District Court judge has ordered a former Dayton-area financial broker to pay more than $1.1 million in a civil case brought against him by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The SEC sued John Gregory Schmidt, 67, of Bellbrook in October for allegedly misappropriating more than $1.6 million from clients — including many elderly clients — for the past 14 years.

In a “final judgment” issued by U.S. District Judge Walter Rice last week, Schmidt was ordered to pay $270,663, money Rice wrote represents “profits gained as a result” of conduct involved in what the SEC charged was a “classic fraudulent scheme.”

Schmidt was also ordered to pay $864,301 in a civil penalty to the SEC.

The defendant had 14 days from the Feb. 19 issuance of Rice’s order to pay.

Rice noted in the order that the final judgment was filed without Schmidt “admitting or denying the allegation of the (SEC) complaint.”

The SEC called Schmidt’s actions a “long-running scheme.”

“From at least 2003 through 2017, Schmidt betrayed his customers’ trust by perpetrating a classic fraudulent scheme: he robbed Peter to pay Paul,” the SEC said in its original complaint.

The SEC charged that Schmidt sold the securities of some of his customers and secretly transferred more than $1 million in proceeds to 10 other customers to cover shortfalls in their accounts in a “rob Peter to pay Paul” arrangement.

The SEC said he attempted to cover unauthorized sales and withdrawals from variable annuities held by customers, “secretly transferring funds using fraudulent letters of authorization, and issuing fake account statements.”

Schmidt also faces criminal charges in Montgomery County Common Pleas Court. There, he was indicted in December on 128 felony counts related to alleged securities fraud in his work as a financial advisor.

“This is the last step in our district court litigation against Mr. Schmidt,” a spokeswoman for the SEC said Monday.

In the common pleas case, Schmidt and his attorneys have moved to suppress evidence investigators seized in a search of Schmidt’s Centerville home.

The motion argues that investigators had no probable cause to search his Paragon Road home and that the search itself was “too general, leaving too much discretion to law enforcement officers as to what is to be seized.

”Further, the motion argues that investigators relied on an “unreliable informant.

”The motion also seeks to suppress anything Schmidt said before he was read his Miranda rights.

An oral hearing on the motion is set for 1:30 p.m. Wednesday in Montgomery County Common Pleas Judge Gregory Singer’s court.A message seeking comment was left with Schmidt’s Dayton-area attorney, Steven Pierson.

John Greg Schmidt Broker | John Greg Schmidt Lawsuit

Based on our experience, we believe that there are more investors who have been the victim of John Greg Schmidt’s alleged broker misconduct and investment fraud. If you’ve worked with or invested with John Greg Schmidt, you should contact Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane immediately for a FREE Consultation.

Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane is currently investigating John Greg Schmidt’s practices, as well as the products he recommended to individual investors. Concerns about possible broker misconduct and investment fraud are serious, and we are committed to fighting on behalf of investors. Contact Us Today for a FREE Consultation. 585-310-5140

Peiffer Wolf (1296 Posts)


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.