Investment Advisor Accused of Defrauding Church, Others in Ponzi Scheme

A Dallas investment advisor has been accused of defrauding investors, including her own church, out of $2.3 million, in a fraudulent Ponzi scheme.

Delsa U. Thomas, a former stockbroker, was charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with raising millions of dollars from investors in the United States and Canada through misrepresentations about the safety and potential returns of their investments.

Thomas told her victims she would invest their money in a variety of products, from a high-yield investment program to U.S. Treasury securities, according to the SEC.  In fact, she either did not invest her customers’ money as promised, or immediately took loans on margin against their investments, without disclosing such loans to her victims, the SEC charged.

Thomas used the investors’ money to make Ponzi scheme payments to earlier investors, finance her lifestyle, support her relatives, and make a supposed “donation” to her church, according to the Commission’s Complaint.  The donation, along with her credentials, induced the church to rely on her investment advice, according to the SEC.

Thomas has a history of lawsuits arising out of alleged investment-related misconduct.  In an earlier lawsuit, she has been accused by eleven investors of putting their funds in an investment fund that was unsuitable and neglecting to oversee their investments.

This blog is for general information only.  It does not, and is not intended to, include any legal advice.  We enter into attorney-client relationships only pursuant to written agreements signed by both parties.  Nothing in this blog shall be construed to be an offer to provide legal services or a solicitation of an attorney-client relationship. 

Peiffer Wolf (1302 Posts)


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.