Jason LeBlanc—Outside Business Activities

Rochester stockbroker fraud attorneyJason H. LeBlanc Allegedly Failed to Disclose Several Outside Business Activities to Girard Securities, Inc. and Provided Inaccurate Information about an Outside Business Activity to the Firm

Jason LeBlanc, between January 2012 and September 2015, allegedly failed to disclose several outside business activities to Girard Securities, Inc. and provided inaccurate information about an outside business activity to the firm, according to a recent Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) currently under review by attorneys Alan Rosca and James Booker.

Investors who believe they may have lost money in activity related to Jason LeBlanc’s alleged outside business activities are encouraged to contact attorneys Alan Rosca or James Booker with any useful information or for a free, no obligation discussion about their options.

The Peiffer Rosca Wolf securities lawyers are currently investigating Jason LeBlanc’s alleged outside business activities

Furthermore, LeBlanc, between January 2012 and September 2015, also allegedly engaged in private securities transactions without the knowledge or approval of Girard, according to the aforementioned AWC.

LeBlanc, for example, in 2012, sold promissory notes totaling $113,000 to four Girard customers through MS, a limited liability company whose sole owner is LeBlanc’s wife, the AWC states.

Said promissory notes were allegedly signed on behalf of MS by LeBlanc‘s wife and LeBlanc purportedly conducts MS’s day-to-day business and controls its finances, the AWC notes.

The aforementioned money raised was pooled together and used for real estate investment, the AWC reports. What is more, LeBlanc, also in 2012, allegedly sold $80,000 in promissory notes to four Girard customers through yet another company, DL, a real estate holding company also owned by his wife, the AWC states.

Jason H. LeBlanc Barred by FINRA for Several Alleged Outside Business Activities

Jason LeBlanc also allegedly sold nine partnership interests in AGC totaling $131,000, which were securities and said money was pooled and used for, among other things, investment in the coffee shop, according to the aforementioned AWC currently under review by attorneys Alan Rosca and James Booker.

Furthermore, LeBlanc allegedly sold 16 promissory notes from MS totaling $346,218, notes which were also securities, the AWC reports. Said money was pooled and used for, among other things, investment in the coffee shop, the AWC notes.

LeBlanc, after the course of a FINRA investigation, allegedly did not provide documents to FINRA that were requested pursuant to FINRA Rules, and hence, violated FINRA Rules and has been barred by FINRA, the AWC notes.

One should also note that, according to the AWC, Jason LeBlanc neither admitted nor denied the FINRA findings.

Securities Lawyers Investigating

The Peiffer Rosca Wolf securities lawyers often represent investors who lose money as a result of investment fraud and are currently investigating Jason LeBlanc’s alleged outside business activities. They take most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only get paid for their fees and costs out of money they recover for their clients.

Investors who believe they lost money as a result of Jason LeBlanc’s alleged outside business activities may contact the securities lawyers at Peiffer Rosca Wolf, Alan Rosca or James Booker, for a free no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, at 888-998-0520 or via e-mail at arosca@prwlegal.com or jbooker@prwlegal.com.

Alan Rosca (1168 Posts)

Alan is a securities lawyer. He also teaches Securities Regulation at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. He focuses his legal practice on complex commercial and financial litigation and arbitration, particularly in the areas of securities and investment fraud. His office is in Cleveland, Ohio.


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.