Michael Peter Pacult– Adequacy of Certain Disclosures Contained in the Notice of Proposed Merger Issued to Investors

investment fraud attorneysMichael Peter Pacult Investigated by FINRA Regarding the Alleged Adequacy of Certain Disclosures Contained in the Notice of Proposed Merger Issued to Investors

Michael Peter Pacult was investigated by FINRA regarding the Alleged Adequacy of Certain Disclosures Contained in the Notice of Proposed Merger Issued to Investors, according to a FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent currently under review by attorneys Alan Rosca and Joe Peiffer.

During all times relevant to this matter, the AWC notes, was the President, Chief Compliance Officer and 50 percent owner of the Firm, Future Investment Company (FIC) whose primary business was the sale of managed futures funds issued by commodity pools owned and managed by Respondent.

The Peiffer Rosca Wolf securities lawyers are currently investigating the adequacy of certain disclosures made by Michael Peter Pacult in the notice of a proposed merger issue to investors.

Michael Peter Pacult Has Been Barred for Failure to Appear for On-the-record Testimony in Connection With a FINRA Investigation

Michael Peter Pacult allegedly received a letter from FINRA requesting that he appear for on-the-record testimony, and acknowledged that he received FINRA’s request to provide the requested documents and information at any time, , according to the aforementioned AWC being examined by attorneys Joe Peiffer and Alan Rosca.

Michael Peter Pacult, by failing to provide on-the-record testimony requested pursuant to FINRA Rules allegedly violated FINRA Rules, the AWC notes.

One should also note that, according to the AWC, Michael Peter Pacult neither admitted nor denied the FINRA findings.

Securities Lawyers Investigating

The Peiffer Rosca Wolf securities lawyers often represent investors who lose money as a result of the adequacy of certain disclosures contained in the notice of proposed merger issued to investors and are currently investigating Michael Peter Pacult’s similar alleged violations. They take most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only get paid for their fees and costs out of money they recover for their clients.

Investors who believe they lost money as a result of Michael Peter Pacult’s adequacy of certain disclosures contained in the notice of proposed merger issued to investors are encouraged to contact the securities lawyers at Peiffer Rosca Wolf, Alan Rosca or Joe Peiffer, for a free no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, at 888-998-0520.

Alan Rosca (1225 Posts)

Alan is a securities lawyer. He also teaches Securities Regulation at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. He focuses his legal practice on complex commercial and financial litigation and arbitration, particularly in the areas of securities and investment fraud. His office is in Cleveland, Ohio.


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.