Moloney Takes FINRA Rules for Boloney, According to FINRA’s Allegations Regarding Sales of Non-Traditional ETFs

investment fraud attorney ClevelandMoloney Securities Company, Inc. was fined and censured by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) relating to allegations that Moloney failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system regarding the sale of leveraged, inverse and inverse leveraged securities, collectively known as Non-Traditional ETFs.

Non-Traditional ETFs are designed to return a multiple of an underlying index or benchmark, the inverse of that benchmark, or both, over only the course of one trading session – typically a single day, according to FINRA. The performance of Non-Traditional ETFs over periods longer than a single trading session wildly differ from the performance of the underlying index or benchmark correlating with the same time period. FINRA has advised broker-dealers and their representatives that Non-Traditional ETFs are not typically suitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading session due to the risks and the inherent complexity of the products.

Moloney allowed it representatives to recommend and sell Non-Traditional ETFs to customers from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, according to FINRA. Despite the unique features and notable risks associated with Non-Traditional ETFs, Moloney failed to provide its representatives or supervisors with any trading or other guidance relating to the appropriateness of Non-Traditional ETFs for its customers, according FINRA. Additionally, Moloney did not provide reports to its supervisory personal to monitor either the length of time that customers held open positions in Non-Traditional ETFs or any losses associated with customers holding such positions, according to FINRA.

Moloney agreed to be censured and fined $20,000 without denying or admitting FINRA’s findings.

The Peiffer Rosca securities attorneys often represent investors who lose money as a result of Ponzi schemes, investment fraud, or stockbroker misconduct. They are currently investigating the possibility of assisting victims with the recovery of their losses. They take most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only get paid for their fees and costs out of money they recover for their clients.

Investors who believe they lost money as a result of investment fraud or misconduct may contact the securities lawyers at Peiffer Rosca, Alan Rosca or Joe Peiffer, for a free, no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, at 888-998-0520.

Alan Rosca (1225 Posts)

Alan is a securities lawyer. He also teaches Securities Regulation at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. He focuses his legal practice on complex commercial and financial litigation and arbitration, particularly in the areas of securities and investment fraud. His office is in Cleveland, Ohio.


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.