Morgan Stanley ordered to pay $2.4M arbitration award over former broker’s trades

Steven Mark Wyatt was let go from the firm in 2012, but his actions continue to be the subject of cases against the top wirehouse

A Finra arbitration panel has ordered Morgan Stanley to pay at least $2.4 million in the latest round of claims by clients of a former Mississippi broker who has repeatedly been accused of mishandling investments, .

A group of physicians and their family members were the latest clients to be awarded a monetary judgment after accusing former Morgan Stanley broker Steven Mark Wyatt of unauthorized and excessive stock-market trading they say cost them money during and after the 2008 financial crisis.

Mr. Wyatt purchased thinly-traded stocks for his clients that he himself owned, while also loading up his clients’ portfolios with speculative bets on exchange-traded funds and other securities, according to a lawyer for the clients who brought the case, Joseph C. Peiffer at Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane Abdullah Carr and Kane.

The panel decision — dated July 24 and released by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. — is the latest in a series of claims against Mr. Wyatt and his firm and managers at his Ridgeland, Miss., branch.

Four previous cases involving Mr. Wyatt have been settled or resolved in a similar fashion without an admission of guilt. He’s been found liable in two additional cases. Two more cases are pending, according to regulatory filings.

“We’re not done with this guy,” said Mr. Peiffer, the physicians’ lawyer, who is based in New Orleans. “There were failures at every level of leadership.”

He said Morgan Stanley failed to see warning signs, including unauthorized trading.

Mr. Wyatt was discharged from Morgan Stanley in 2012 and hasn’t worked as a U.S.-registered broker since, according to his BrokerCheck report. His lawyer, George C. Freeman III of New Orleans-based Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman and Sarver, did not respond to a request for comment.


Peiffer Wolf (1248 Posts)

In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.