Morgan Stanley Owes $2.5M Over Trader Supervision

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel has awarded $2.5 million to a group of physicians who claim their Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. trader in Jackson, Mississippi, was able to commit unauthorized trades and falsify business returns because of a lack of supervision.

The three-arbitrator panel found July 24 that Morgan Stanley and branch manager Fred Brister were liable for compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs, under federal and state law after a broker allegedly traded investors’ money fraudulently before the 2008 financial crisis.

Joe C. Peiffer of Peiffer Wolf Carr & Can, APLC said his six clients went to a big name like Morgan Stanley for investment services, expecting that someone would watch over their broker, who allegedly went rogue with their money.

“From day one until the day Steve Wyatt left [the company] there was almost no supervision,” Peiffer said. “It’s just about as bad as I’ve ever seen. I’ve represented more than 500 investors and this behavior is about as bad as it gets.”

The physicians filed their claims in June 2012, claiming their investment professional at Morgan Stanley had traded erratically without their authorization, he said.

Peiffer said his investor clients arbitrated the dispute over six months. He also claims very few FINRA awards get attorneys’ fees, awards and interest, and attributes the award to the severity of investment professional Steve Wyatt’s conduct and Morgan Stanley’s lack of oversight.

Included in the award was about $1.5 million for compensatory damages, about $104,000 for punitive damages, $609,000 for attorneys’ fees and interest on the compensatory damages.

Peiffer said his clients hope Mississippi regulators will take action against Wyatt.

Credits: Law360

Peiffer Wolf (1316 Posts)

In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.