Peiffer Rosca Wolf Securities Attorneys Investigating Potential Claims on Behalf of Fang Holdings Investors

California stockbroker fraud attorneyThe Peiffer Rosca Wolf securities attorneys are investigating potential claims on behalf of those who purchased Fang Holdings Limited (NYSE: SFUN) securities. The Peiffer Rosca Wolf attorneys are investigating whether Fang Holdings and any of its officers and directors may have violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A report from Bloomberg News on March 29, 2017 gave rise to the Peiffer Rosca Wolf investigation.  According to the Bloomberg report, the housing commission of Beijing City canceled the brokerage license of a Fang Holdings’ unit, “because the unit posted fake online information for property sales.” The American depositary shares (ADS) of Fang Holding’s closed down $0.06, or 2.17%, on March 29, 2017 following this news.

The Peiffer Rosca Wolf Abdullah Carr & Kane law firm represents individual and institutional investors who have suffered financial losses as a result of investment fraud or misconduct, Ponzi schemes, unsuitable investment recommendations, or abusive practices in the financial industry.

Investors who acquired Fang Holdings securities are encouraged to call the Peiffer Rosca Wolf securities attorneys Alan Rosca or James Booker at 888-998-0520 or by completing the contact form on this website. You may also contact our law firm via email at arosca@prwlegal.com.

Alan Rosca (1157 Posts)

Alan is a securities lawyer. He also teaches Securities Regulation at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. He focuses his legal practice on complex commercial and financial litigation and arbitration, particularly in the areas of securities and investment fraud. His office is in Cleveland, Ohio.


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.