Robert Christian Acri Barred From Securities Industry After Failing to Substantially Comply with FINRA Investigation

stockbroker fraud attorney clevelandRobert Christian Acri is barred from the securities industry in connection with claims that he failed to substantially comply with an investigation conducted by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

Acri was under investigation by FINRA in connection with his alleged involvement in the sale of alternative investments, including promissory notes, that had defaulted. Acri failed to substantially comply with all aspects of FINRA’s requests for information and documents that were material to FINRA’s investigation, according to FINRA.

Acri consented to his barring from the securities industry by FINRA without denying or admitting FINRA’s factual findings.

The Peiffer Rosca securities attorneys often represent investors who lose money as a result of Ponzi schemes, investment fraud, or stockbroker misconduct. They are currently investigating the possibility of assisting victims with the recovery of their losses. They take most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only get paid for their fees and costs out of money they recover for their clients.

Investors who believe they may have lost money as a result of investment fraud or broker misconduct may contact the securities lawyers at Peiffer Rosca, Joe Peiffer, Alan Rosca, or Jason Kane for a free, no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, at 888-998-0520.

Broker: Robert Christian Acri

Status: INVESTIGATED by Peiffer Rosca.

For brokercheck report and additional info click here!

Alan Rosca (1160 Posts)

Alan is a securities lawyer. He also teaches Securities Regulation at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. He focuses his legal practice on complex commercial and financial litigation and arbitration, particularly in the areas of securities and investment fraud. His office is in Cleveland, Ohio.


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.