Ron McCullough and David Mayhew Charged with Fraud

Ron E. McCullough and David C. Mayhew (also known as David Mahew) defrauded investors in connection with leveraged or margined off-exchange foreign currency (forex) trading, according to a complaint filed by the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

McCullough and Mayhew oversaw the fraudulent solicitation of approximately $2.3 million from at least 11 investors to trade forex while misrepresenting the risks of trading forex, falsely guaranteeing the return of the investors’ principal, falsely promising high returns, and failing to disclose that they intended to use investor funds to pay principal and purported profits to other customers and for personal expenses, according to regulators’ complaint.

McCullough and Mayhew misappropriated approximately $808,000 to make payments to customers and misappropriated $829,000 of investors’ funds to pay their personal expenses, including airfare and hotels, an online forex trading course, and liposuction for Mayhew, according to the complaint.

All of this occurred while Mayhew allegedly caused false statements to be issued to investors that concealed the misappropriation of funds, trading losses, and lack of trading.

The Peiffer Wolf securities attorneys often represent investors who lose money as a result of Ponzi schemes, investment fraud, or stockbroker misconduct. They are currently investigating the possibility of assisting investors with the recovery of their losses. They take most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advance the case costs, and only get paid for their fees and costs out of money they recover for their clients.

Investors who believe they lost money as a result of investment fraud or misconduct may contact the securities lawyers at Peiffer Wolf, Jason Kane or Joe Peiffer, for a free, no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, at 585-310-5140.

Peiffer Wolf (1316 Posts)


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.