Statesville, North Carolina Businessman Charged with Fraud

Daniel Harold Williford, a Statesville, North Carolina businessman, has been charged with perpetrating a $44 million fraudulent investment scheme that defrauded over 200 victims in North Carolina and elsewhere.

Court documents reviewed by securities attorneys Jason Kane and Joe Peiffer allege that Daniel Williford told his victims he operated a number of telecommunications and IT ventures, including VelocenetBroadband Leasing, and Connect, Inc.

Investigation by attorneys Jason Kane and Joe Peiffer established that none of Williford‘s entities listed above had filed registration statements for securities offerings with the federal securities regulators.

Williford promised investors that he would invest their money in wireless Internet equipment, Internet towers, and other telecommunications assets and ventures, according to the federal prosecutors’ charges.

In reality, Williford stole most of the money he raised from his victims, the prosecutors alleged.

Of the $44 million he raised, Daniel Williford only invested $7.7 million in his companies and spent the rest of the money to support his lifestyle and pay off earlier investors, in Ponzi-scheme fashion, according to the indictment reviewed by attorneys Kane and Peiffer.

Securities lawyers Jason Kane and Joe Peiffer often assist investors in fraudulent schemes.  They take most cases on behalf of investors on a contingency fee basis, advance the case costs, and only get paid for costs and fees out of any amounts recovered for investors.

Investors in Daniel Williford’s alleged scheme may contact the Peiffer Wolf law firm to provide more information about the scheme and receive a free, no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, toll free at 585-310-5140.

Peiffer Wolf (1302 Posts)

In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.