United Development Funding IV Investors Represented by Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane Lawyers File Arbitration Claims Against Broker-Dealers That Sold UDF Products

New Orleans stockbroker fraud attorney

New Orleans stockbroker fraud attorney

United Development Funding IV investors represented by Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane investor right lawyers have started filing claims against brokerage firms that sold them unsuitable UDF products. The Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane attorneys overseeing the securities arbitration claims filed on behalf of clients, Jason Kane and James Booker, are working to file additional claims on behalf of many other UDF investors against brokerage firms that made inappropriate investment recommendations of such products to  their customers.

United Development Funding IV investors continue to contact the Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane investors rights attorneys in the wake of news that UDF received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as being delisted from trading on NASDAQ and listed on the OTC grey market.

The Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane attorneys will continue to pursue action on behalf of investors against brokers that provided inappropriate products and recommendations regarding UDF products, including UDF IV. The firm would like to hear from investors who purchased UDF products as it prepares to take further action on behalf of more UDF investors.

The investor right lawyers at Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane typically represent investors on a contingency fee basis, with no money down. They advance they case costs and only get paid for their fees and the case expenses if and when they recover money for their clients.

Investors who believe they lost money as a result of UDF’s alleged Ponzi scheme can contact the attorneys at Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane, Jason Kane or James Booker, at (585) 310-5140, or via email at arosca@prwlegal.com for a free, no obligation evaluation of their recovery options.

phil korosec (1250 Posts)


In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent blogs regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases.